Skip navigation

no spam, unsubscribe anytime.
Skip navigation
Goal: 30,000 Progress: 1,117
Sponsored by: The Autism Site

Rapid Prompting Method (RPM) is a teaching method invented by Soma Mukhopadhyay. Specifically meant for nonverbal autism, it involves constantly prompting a student to keep them focused on the matter at hand.[1]

Perhaps most astoundingly, however, it supposedly leads to communication. By spelling out words on a letter board, it has allegedly unlocked the minds of individuals with nonspeaking autism, allowing them to freely express thoughts they were once unable to verbalize. RPM assumes that these individuals have average or even above-average intelligence but are impeded by issues like apraxia and sensory overload.[1] Quite a contrast from our current, generalized view of people with nonverbal autism — that they lack understanding and cognitive abilities.

If RPM really does do what it claims to do, the implications are unimaginable. Intelligent people locked within themselves, unable to communicate anything more than basic needs, stuck in classes that teach them the alphabet and numbers one through ten, could be freed from cages of silence, frustration, and boredom. This would benefit not only them but humanity as well.

Here's the problem, though: we don't know for sure if RPM really leads to communication because no one has studied it.

The reason? Some say it's a rebranded form of Facilitated Communication (FC)[2] — a product of the 90's in which a facilitator supported the hands of nonverbal individuals as they typed on a keyboard. This communication method has been largely debunked and branded pseudoscientific,[3] as research discovered facilitators were unconsciously manipulating the subjects.

Yet proponents of RPM say that there are vital differences between them. RPM does not make use of physical touch, and, most significantly, many individuals who learn to communicate through RPM are eventually able to type independently.[4]

There's no telling which side is correct because, aside from one small study that didn't even study RPM's communication claims,[5] we have no thorough, peer-reviewed literature evaluating the method's efficacy. So we have two sides going back and forth over something we don't even objectively know about for sure.

Enough is enough! We need answers, not just for the sake of scientific advancement but also for the sake of people with nonspeaking autism and their families. Could RPM change the lives of some people with autism, or is it simply a waste of time and money? There's only one way to find out.

Tell the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) to conduct or support a solid, peer-reviewed research study on RPM. For the sake of people with nonverbal autism, we need to know the truth once and for all.

Sign Here

Dear National Institute of Child Health and Human Development,

Rapid Prompting Method (RPM) is a teaching method for individuals with nonverbal autism that eventually leads to communication. Since its creation, anecdotal success stories have arisen: children and teenagers with nonverbal autism, once thought to have low IQs and minimal receptive language abilities, showed themselves to have average, or even above average, intelligence, as well as complex thoughts. Through spelling out words on a letterboard or typing on a keyboard or tablet, many have allegedly been unlocked from a prison of silence.

However, RPM is a controversial method. Skeptics have argued that it is merely a rebranded form of Facilitated Communication (FC) — a pseudoscientific method that emerged in the 1990s, in which facilitators supported the hands of nonverbal individuals to allow them to type (in reality, these facilitators subconsciously guided the individuals). Skeptics argue that RPM is functionally the same.

Proponents argue that RPM is not the same thing as FC, however; physical touch is not involved, and participants are eventually able to type independently.

These two sides have clashed over the years. All the while, the communication aspect of RPM has remained completely unstudied. People have jumped to conclusions without having solid, empirical evidence to back them up.

That is why we are asking you to step in and help settle this controversy by conducting or supporting solid, peer-reviewed research that evaluates the efficacy of RPM as a communicational outlet for individuals with nonverbal autism.

The impact of a thorough, carefully-conducted study on this subject cannot be understated. If a group of pioneering researchers discover that subjects using RPM can, in fact, communicate independently, that will open the door to more research — and potentially people with autism who may have thoughts locked inside of them. Finding that RPM does work could give freedom to people who long ago lost hope that their voices would ever be heard.

Alternatively, if a group of pioneering researchers discover that RPM does not work, this could save families vast amounts of time and money they would otherwise be using to experiment with an ineffective method.

Either way, researching RPM will broaden our knowledge and benefit a largely ignored population — people and families who desperately need more knowledge, help, and support.

Communication, something we so often take for granted, is a vital aspect of humanity. If RPM could be an effective method for even some individuals with severe autism, we need to know so that we can give them this human right. And if it doesn't, we need to know that, also. This isn't just about scientific exploration. This is about ethics.

So please — help us settle the debates. Be the pioneer who takes this essential step forward. Let's stop speculating and actually work together to find an answer. Because regardless of what it is, the futures of people with autism and their families depend on it.


Petition Signatures

Apr 18, 2018 Amy Weise
Apr 12, 2018 (Name not displayed)
Apr 11, 2018 (Name not displayed)
Apr 10, 2018 Amy Cheshier
Apr 7, 2018 Lisa vasta
Mar 27, 2018 freddie williams
Mar 26, 2018 Teri Messerschmidt
Mar 26, 2018 (Name not displayed)
Mar 25, 2018 CarolC Maindonald
Mar 25, 2018 Janice Thompson
Mar 24, 2018 Deborah Brown
Mar 24, 2018 (Name not displayed)
Mar 24, 2018 (Name not displayed)
Mar 23, 2018 Veronica Caldwell
Mar 21, 2018 M. Browning
Mar 20, 2018 (Name not displayed)
Mar 12, 2018 David Schaechtel
Mar 11, 2018 Carol Bostick
Mar 11, 2018 Lorraine Costea
Mar 11, 2018 Ginger Gorum
Mar 11, 2018 (Name not displayed)
Mar 11, 2018 MaryEdna Salvi This is just the usual bs that happens when people loose focus of a goal or cause which is always for the people, in this case certain people who this could open up doors that would change their lives and the ones who love them, just do the study!!
Mar 11, 2018 John Davis
Mar 11, 2018 (Name not displayed)
Mar 11, 2018 Lyssa Twomey
Mar 11, 2018 Lori Mathis
Mar 11, 2018 Marilyn Sanchez Please do this!
Mar 11, 2018 JoAnn Loomis
Mar 11, 2018 Katherine Gold
Mar 11, 2018 (Name not displayed)
Mar 11, 2018 Jo Anne Godwin
Mar 11, 2018 (Name not displayed)
Mar 11, 2018 Patty Langford
Mar 11, 2018 LARRY BRANSON
Mar 11, 2018 Thomas Washburn, M.D.
Mar 11, 2018 (Name not displayed)
Mar 11, 2018 Timothy Spong
Mar 11, 2018 Lynne Lerner
Mar 11, 2018 Diana Spencer
Mar 11, 2018 Heather Todd
Mar 11, 2018 Sandra J Rubio
Mar 11, 2018 Kimberley Clack
Mar 11, 2018 Marga Childs
Mar 11, 2018 MAUREEN KENNY
Mar 11, 2018 Denis Cole
Mar 11, 2018 Rosalie Fisher
Mar 11, 2018 Kurt Schneider
Mar 11, 2018 Pamela Kjono
Mar 11, 2018 Andrew Kossoy
Mar 11, 2018 Rose Ann Hayes

back to top

Teardrop Roosting Pocket Birdhouse
Share this page and help fund therapy: